EOS Module 05

Workforce as Productive Capacity: People Under an American System Filter

Learn · Diagnose

1 · Learn
Slide deck
Open the deck
2 · Diagnose
One question at a time
Start the diagnostic
3 · Next
No EOS agentic packaged kit available. Start a kit build, or a Fit conversation.

PDF hosted on the source library; open/download if the embedded view does not load in your browser. Download / open PDF

Joshua Konkle · Operator

Posture: American System / Hamiltonian filter on native EOS tools. Not a claim that standard EOS practice is Hamiltonian.

1. Diagnostic Checklist

Use with leadership or alone. Prefer facts over aspirations. Complete in the guided checklist (Yes / Partially / No + short note). No essay required.

Seats & dependence

[ ] We have named 1–2 critical seat families (roles where loss of two long-tenure people would break delivery or knowledge).
[ ] Leadership has named at least one critical seat family that will not be designed as a permanent short-cycle temporary or visa labor seat (Module 5 required output).
[ ] We can point to where short-cycle temporary or visa labor is a bridge vs a permanent design assumption.
[ ] Failure mode check: Any critical seat still designed as permanent short-cycle temporary or visa labor coverage is treated as a capacity risk, not a neutral staffing choice.
[ ] We know which critical seats would fail if two long-tenure people left in the next 90 days.

GWC + American System question

[ ] We run standard GWC (Gets it, Wants it, Capacity to do it) on open and critical seats.
[ ] We also ask the American System question after GWC: Does this seat design reduce dependence on short-cycle temporary or visa labor and build institutional knowledge that stays?
(This is an additional filter question — not a change to the native EOS People Analyzer.)
[ ] Open seats still assume (or no longer assume) “we can always contract or visa our way through.”

Scorecard & visibility

[ ] The Scorecard includes these locked capacity metrics (verbatim) for a named seat family:
1. pipeline health for a named critical seat family
2. retention of institutional knowledge in critical seats
3. share of critical seats held by long-term American workers
[ ] Operators who own the seat family own those metrics (not only Finance/HR).
[ ] A green cost/fill Scorecard can still be treated as a problem if capacity metrics are red or missing.

Process & Level 10

[ ] Level 10 IDS (Identify, Discuss, Solve) is used when capacity is slipping and cost still looks fine — not only when headcount is short.
[ ] Accountability Chart makes critical knowledge and decision rights visible (not only interchangeable boxes).

Anchors (shared language)

[ ] Team can state the Elevator logic: when elevators stopped needing a dedicated operator, work moved into higher-skill design, maintenance, and system roles — design should elevate work into higher-skill American roles, not only eliminate hours.
[ ] Team can state the Freedom Haulers / sovereign pipeline idea: replacing short-cycle temporary or visa labor CDL capacity with American veterans who already hold the skill is a workforce and pipeline decision, not only a cost line.
[ ] Posture: Operating in the United States is not workforce-neutral. Seat design either builds lasting productive capacity or rents weakness.

Diagnostic result (one line): Where is our biggest gap — seat design, GWC-only hiring, missing capacity metrics, permanent short-cycle temporary or visa labor design on critical seats, or Level 10 that never IDS’s capacity vs cost?

2. 90-Day Outline (Free Execution Scaffold)

This is a starting outline, not a full managed engagement. Paid implementation support (e.g. 90-Day Sovereign Capacity Sprint) sits behind deeper facilitation, accountability, and cross-module integration.

Days 1–30 — Diagnose

Action	Output
Name 1–2 critical seat families	Written list + why they are critical
Required: Name ≥1 critical seat family that will not be designed as a permanent short-cycle temporary or visa labor seat	Leadership-signed design choice
Map where knowledge lives and where short-cycle temporary or visa labor coverage is structural	Simple map (seat → knowledge risk → labor type)
Flag any critical seat still on permanent short-cycle temporary or visa labor design as capacity risk	Explicit failure-mode list
Run GWC + American System capacity question on those seats	Pass/fail + capacity notes per seat
Check Scorecard for locked capacity metrics	Present / missing / owner

Days 31–60 — Redesign

Action	Output
Redesign one seat family for elevated work and knowledge retention	Seat description + pipeline step
Define a simple pipeline step (internal or veteran/high-skill American path where relevant)	One concrete pipeline action
Add locked Scorecard capacity metrics (verbatim) for the named seat family	Metrics live on Scorecard with operator owners
Align at least one Rock to a locked capacity metric	Rock statement + owner + metric link

Days 61–90 — Execute & Embed

Action	Output
Run Level 10s that IDS when capacity slips and cost still looks fine	Documented IDS examples
Lock seat design + metric pair for the next quarter; keep the signed non–short-cycle-temporary-or-visa-labor design choice visible on (or referenced by) the Accountability Chart	V/TO / Rocks / Scorecard / Accountability Chart hand-offs noted
Hand implications to Vision (Module 1), Rocks (Module 2), Scorecard (Module 3), Process (Module 4)	Short hand-off list

Success check at day 90: One critical seat family has a non–short-cycle-temporary-or-visa-labor design choice; no critical seat remains on unchallenged permanent short-cycle temporary or visa labor design; at least one locked capacity metric is live with an operator owner; Level 10 has used IDS on capacity vs cost at least once — so People design builds lasting productive capacity rather than rents weakness.

3. Soft Cross-Reference (BMC)

BMC Module 5 (Workforce Strategy) applies the same American System filter in Canvas language. Preferred path for teams new to the filter: free BMC series first, then EOS. Teams already running EOS may start here and still use BMC diagnostics alongside — no mandatory sequence.

4. What This Companion Is / Is Not

Is	Is not
Free diagnostic + 90-day scaffold (guided checklist compatible)	Full facilitation or done-for-you redesign
Aligned to native EOS tools + Hamiltonian filter	A rewrite of EOS or a claim that EOS = American System
Funnel toward paid execution support if useful	Required purchase to use the checklist

Joshua Konkle · Operator · @7SwanSwimming · 512-423-5448 · joshua@digitalknowledge.net

Fit conversation