American System | Hamiltonian Education

One-Page Diagnostic Checklist

Workforce & Productive Capacity Diagnostic

Checks stay in this browser only. No account required. Prefer one question at a time? Open the guided diagnostic.

0 of 12 complete

We have clearly identified the roles most critical to our productive capacity over the next 3–5 years.
We know where we currently lose people in those roles and why.
We can state what percentage of skilled roles are filled by long-term American workers vs. temporary/short-cycle non-sovereign labor.

We have active pipelines (internal development, apprenticeships, veterans pathways, or local partnerships) that build American talent into our critical roles.
Our local talent ecosystem is meaningfully aligned with our actual needs.
We measure success by capability growth and retention of high performers, not only time-to-fill.

We have evaluated our major production or supplier locations against the goal of strengthening domestic productive capacity.
We understand the true strategic risk (not just unit cost) of relying on non-domestic sources for critical capabilities.
Location decisions are explicitly linked to our ability to develop and retain a high-capability American workforce.

We have reviewed our Business Model Canvas through a productive-sovereignty lens.
Key Resources and Key Activities prioritize domestic capability and innovation-driven productivity over labor arbitrage.
We have identified 2–3 high-leverage changes we could make in the next 90 days.

Summary notes / priority gaps — capture on paper or in your team notes.

1.Where in our current operations are we still optimizing primarily for labor cost rather than long-term capability and innovation?
2.Looking at our most critical technical or skilled roles, what would change if we treated the development of American talent as a strategic investment instead of a cost to be minimized?
3.Which elements of our current Business Model Canvas most strengthen productive sovereignty? Which elements most weaken it?
4.If we could only make two changes in the next 90 days to better align workforce and production decisions with domestic capability, what should they be?
5.How exposed are we to the risk that short-cycle temporary labor is quietly eroding institutional knowledge and innovation capacity?
6.What would “innovation as the primary cost reducer” (rather than labor arbitrage) actually look like in our operations?

This is a high-level structure only. A complete, customized 90-day execution plan is available as a paid implementation offering.

Complete the Workforce & Productive Capacity Diagnostic with the leadership team
Identify the 2–3 highest-leverage gaps
Review current Business Model Canvas through the productive-sovereignty filter
Select one critical role family and one major location/supplier decision for focused work

Rewrite Key Resources and Key Activities sections of the Canvas
Define success metrics that reward capability growth and domestic productive strength
Map current vs. desired state for the selected critical role family
Draft initial pipeline or process-innovation actions

Full facilitation, customized metrics, and ongoing Chief of Staff-style support are available on request.